Pages

Thursday, June 23, 2011

The Controversy Over 1 Corinthians 7, Part #1

I may be jumping in over my head here at this time...but I have decided to (well, try to) write some posts on the entire chapter of 1 Corinthians 7.  This chapter tends to be very controversial and is also one of the most misused chapters in the Bible (in my experience), particularly by those who are part of the patriarchical/courtship crowd.  Just yesterday, I received a phone call from a young woman, a friend of mine, whose family does betrothal.  She wanted to ask me questions about my situation with my family.  Of course, like most others who believe that parents MUST give their blessing in order for the marriage to be godly, this young woman used 1 Cor. 7 in an attempt to prove her point.  1 Corinthians 7 also has some teaching on divorce, which can be confusing and controversial as well.  As I tried to go to sleep last night, this chapter kept running through my mind and I decided that I wished to tackle it and get it worked out in my own mind.  Hopefully my musings and study will be beneficial to others as well.  So...  Here we go.

First of all, here is the entire chapter for your perusal.  (This is the New American Standard Version.  To those who may be King James onlyists, I don't dislike the KJV, but there is no evidence that the KJV of the Bible is "holier" than any other Bible translation, English or no.  And I'd be happy to thoroughly tackle that subject at some point too, if necessary.  It is a pet peeve of mine.)  But anyway...

"1 Now concerning the things about which you wrote, it is good for a man not to touch a woman. 2 But because of immoralities, each man is to have his own wife, and each woman is to have her own husband. 3 The husband must fulfill his duty to his wife, and likewise also the wife to her husband. 4 The wife does not have authority over her own body, but the husband does; and likewise also the husband does not have authority over his own body, but the wife does. 5 Stop depriving one another, except by agreement for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer, and come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control. 6 But this I say by way of concession, not of command. 7 Yet I wish that all men were even as I myself am. However, each man has his own gift from God, one in this manner, and another in that.
 8 But I say to the unmarried and to widows that it is good for them if they remain even as I. 9 But if they do not have self-control, let them marry; for it is better to marry than to burn with passion.
 10 But to the married I give instructions, not I, but the Lord, that the wife should not leave her husband 11 (but if she does leave, she must remain unmarried, or else be reconciled to her husband), and that the husband should not divorce his wife.
 12 But to the rest I say, not the Lord, that if any brother has a wife who is an unbeliever, and she consents to live with him, he must not divorce her. 13 And a woman who has an unbelieving husband, and he consents to live with her, she must not send her husband away. 14 For the unbelieving husband is sanctified through his wife, and the unbelieving wife is sanctified through her believing husband; for otherwise your children are unclean, but now they are holy. 15 Yet if the unbelieving one leaves, let him leave; the brother or the sister is not under bondage in such cases, but God has called us to peace. 16 For how do you know, O wife, whether you will save your husband? Or how do you know, O husband, whether you will save your wife?
 17 Only, as the Lord has assigned to each one, as God has called each, in this manner let him walk. And so I direct in all the churches. 18 Was any man called when he was already circumcised? He is not to become uncircumcised. Has anyone been called in uncircumcision? He is not to be circumcised. 19 Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but what matters is the keeping of the commandments of God. 20 Each man must remain in that condition in which he was called.
 21 Were you called while a slave? Do not worry about it; but if you are able also to become free, rather do that. 22 For he who was called in the Lord while a slave, is the Lord’s freedman; likewise he who was called while free, is Christ’s slave. 23 You were bought with a price; do not become slaves of men. 24 Brethren, each one is to remain with God in that condition in which he was called.
 25 Now concerning virgins I have no command of the Lord, but I give an opinion as one who by the mercy of the Lord is trustworthy. 26 I think then that this is good in view of the present distress, that it is good for a man to remain as he is. 27 Are you bound to a wife? Do not seek to be released. Are you released from a wife? Do not seek a wife. 28 But if you marry, you have not sinned; and if a virgin marries, she has not sinned. Yet such will have trouble in this life, and I am trying to spare you. 29 But this I say, brethren, the time has been shortened, so that from now on those who have wives should be as though they had none; 30 and those who weep, as though they did not weep; and those who rejoice, as though they did not rejoice; and those who buy, as though they did not possess; 31 and those who use the world, as though they did not make full use of it; for the form of this world is passing away.
 32 But I want you to be free from concern. One who is unmarried is concerned about the things of the Lord, how he may please the Lord; 33 but one who is married is concerned about the things of the world, how he may please his wife, 34 and his interests are divided. The woman who is unmarried, and the virgin, is concerned about the things of the Lord, that she may be holy both in body and spirit; but one who is married is concerned about the things of the world, how she may please her husband. 35 This I say for your own benefit; not to put a restraint upon you, but to promote what is appropriate and to secure undistracted devotion to the Lord.
 36 But if any man thinks that he is acting unbecomingly toward his virgin daughter, if she is past her youth, and if it must be so, let him do what he wishes, he does not sin; let her marry. 37 But he who stands firm in his heart, being under no constraint, but has authority over his own will, and has decided this in his own heart, to keep his own virgin daughter, he will do well. 38 So then both he who gives his own virgin daughter in marriage does well, and he who does not give her in marriage will do better.
 39 A wife is bound as long as her husband lives; but if her husband is dead, she is free to be married to whom she wishes, only in the Lord. 40 But in my opinion she is happier if she remains as she is; and I think that I also have the Spirit of God."
~1 Corinthians 7:1-40

For now, I'll just let you read the verses (and I'll read them too) and in my next post I'll start tackling this passage.  I have understood 1 Corinthians 7 in a twisted, legalistic way for most of my life, and am excited to be able to come at it with the perspective of one who used to be imprisoned by legalism forced out of this chapter, but is now free to truly study and understand it in the way it was meant to be understood, through the guidance of the Holy Spirit.  Yay!

2 comments:

  1. What puzzles me the most about how people read this passage, is how can they miss that it's written to first century citizen's of the Roman empire; a time and place in which women were all merely the chattel of men?

    Do they not see that nowhere is a woman's will or decision given any attention, except that of a widow? That's because according to civil law of the time, a widow was the ONLY woman with a say in her life!

    Paul is not endorsing civil law; he is addressing questions that first century Roman citizens had about how to love God with all of their hearts and live out normal everyday life. Can you love God with all your heart and marry, young men? Yes.

    But what about fathers? Can they "give" (sell) their daughters into marriage and still be living the life of love Jesus called them to live? Paul answers those questions too. He says in verse 36 that if the father thinks it is harming his daughter to keep her from marriage, he should take the offer. (Many Christian women were martyred for refusing to marry in the early church. They didn't want to become a sex slave to a pagan husband.)

    As a modern woman, the whole organization of Roman society is abhorrent to me, though I am glad the gospel changed things there over time. Still, the fact that we have St. Paul's letter addressing these questions is NO indication that such a social structure is "godly" or "righteous" or approved by god. What is wrong with modern Christianity, that no one reads the Bible for what it IS?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi, Katherine!

    I found your blog several months ago and just haven't commented yet, for one reason or another. :P My now husband and I had a very parallel situation to yours, and even in a parallel time frame, from what it sounds like.

    Anyway, I like reading your blog, and am interested in hearing your further posts on 1 Corinthians 7. ;) I read it in the ESV this past winter, and it all of the sudden made sense in context. WOW! I'd always hated the passage because of what it's twisted around to mean, but now I love it. :D

    Are you on FB? I'd love to get to know you a bit better if I could! :)

    ~Amanda/Rosebud

    ReplyDelete